Judge Hears Shocking Claims About Four Abandoned Children | Paternity Court

I done been around the block SO MANY TIMES I OWN the block. [applause] >> You’re wrong. And I’m not going to sit up in here with the t cry and tell you tell you to your face. You’re dead wrong. Like you keep going after him and he’s this and he’s that and he’s this. And all I keep coming BACK TO IS WHY DO YOU KEEP HAVING BABIES BY HIM THEN? >> REALLY? >> YES. >> The hand other hand. [laughter] A [cheering] see >> I’mma tell you what I’mma get you for

your engagement gift. >> Ashley Alustin walks into court with a steady face but furious nerves. She says the conception window spans just 2 weeks. There are three men under suspicion. Mr. Jones the long and partner Mr. Delt a one night encounter in Joe Jr. whose father is here on his behalf. Jasmine’s paternity will shape her future. Judge Lake cues the first courtroom clip. Austin, you say for the past two years, you’ve been living in uncertainty and confusion, [music] and you’re not sure which of three men

fathered your two-year-old daughter, Jasmine, and say you grew up without a father and don’t want the same [music] for your little girl, >> which is correct. >> Right away, Ashley admits she slept with all three within that short period. The judge raises an eyebrow at the blunt confession. The gallery inhales as Mr. Jones visibly tenses in his seat. Ashley explains Jones and Joe Jr. were ongoing while Delulk was a single night detour. The hearing is already electric >> court today. [music] We’ve tested Mr.

Harrison Senior to help determine paternity. Now, Miss Alustin, please explain to the court how three [music] different men could possibly be your daughter’s biological father. >> Well, basically, your honor, I had I did have sex with all three men within a twoe period of time. >> Mr. Jones takes the stand composed, but raw. He recalls Ashley telling him she feared he might not be the dad. He insists there was no test at that time. Ashley immediately disputes his memory and the back and forth bounces across

the room. Judge Lake watches every rebuttal like a hawk. >> She said to me, “How would you feel if you’re not the dad?” >> That’s not how I told you. That’s not exact. That’s not how I told you. I told you that I was pregnant. I told you after the test that you may not be the father. >> We flash to the hospital scene and the atmosphere thickens. Family members show up unexpectedly, creating awkward reunions in recovery. Mr. Jones’s mother appear, then Joe Jr. s family arrives as

well. Two sets of grandparents orbit the newborn, smiling through confusion. Tension hums beneath the surface as old loyalties register. >> Oh, so the grandparents were were there thinking they were having a grandchild for real. >> Unfort Yes, they did. I didn’t tell them cuz I didn’t want it to be out. I didn’t It was unexpected when I saw both of them there at the hospital. So only the sons only the sons knew that they were possible fathers. >> Ashley’s claim of surprise is contested

by others in attendance. One witness says Ashley texted her to come to the hospital. The I didn’t expect them story starts to wobble. Ashley stiffens under the scrutiny as the judge leans forward. The courtroom begins to parse body language like testimony. >> That is when we saw her mother [music] and we saw her brother. We saw baby Jasmine. She wasn’t in the room yet. [music] And as we were there, Mr. Um Harrison Senior came up shortly. >> Joe Harrison Senior appears via video

radiating grandfatherly warmth. He describes Jasmine’s mannerisms and how she resembles his son in temperament. His voice breaks as he talks about weekend visits and future playdates. The clip softens some hearts in the room. If the DNA says otherwise, those feelings will still be real. >> And [music] then there was complete silence, you know, unnerving. I didn’t know exactly what was going on, but [music] I just thinking in my mind, well, maybe she not. Uh, that’s the impression that I left with.

>> When you saw baby Jasmine and when you look at her pictures, do you believe that she’s your grandchild? >> Well, she looks a lot back in court. Community members discuss child care and family support. Both sides claim they’re stepping up for Jasmine. Baby shouldn’t inherit adult drama as the judge’s quiet reminder. The child’s daily life is at stake while adults argue over identity. It’s a sobering perspective for everyone watching. >> Establish a relationship with baby

Jasmine as well. >> Yes, ma’am. She does the same with me. She comes, she lives with me. I’ll babysit her. The adults are making this much more difficult than it has to be because, you know, she’s the innocent party here. >> Ashley admits she told Jones months earlier he might not be the biological father. Jones’s face registers a blend of hurt and bewilderment. Judge Lake presses for the chronology because the dates are everything. Who knew what and when becomes the pivotal question. The

twoe window is now under intense legal scrutiny. >> You have help? Yes. Robert? No. Right now, if I had to sign my daughter over, I would either sign it to you, Miss Tina, or or to Mr. Harrison. Not to Robert at all. >> The reason why I haven’t done anything for Jasmine as of yet. >> Mr. Del gets his chance to speak. A man who says he showed up and behaved responsibly. He claims he’s been a present figure despite the brief encounter. Ashley glances at him with complicated feeling this wasn’t supposed

to spiral. Jones tightens his jaw and makes no move. The triangle becomes a knotted braid. um last August until early this February because I lost my job so I was financially unstable. >> Well, 7 months out of a two-year that’s a significant amount of time for her to spend with somebody. [applause] He says he’s been a father figure. You know, I want to hear from him. Jerome, can you please escort Mr. Delk into the courtroom, please? >> Mr. Delk. >> Yes, your honor. >> Please be seated. Thank you for joining

us today. >> Judge Lake converts the story into a timeline, forcing each memory into boxes. The gallery calculates silently as if everyone brought spreadsheets to court. Delk emphasizes presence. Jones leans on history and Joe Jr. as family leans on early attachment. The matter reduces to dates, not drama. >> Hey, this was when you was doing your little paperwork and trying to find a job and everything. And uh basically what was going on was like you say, we wasn’t no boyfriend, girlfriend. It was

one night stand. >> One night stand. >> That’s it. One night. >> We revisit the emotional hospital tableau because that moment matters most. Imagine two families walking into one recovery room, hopeful and unaware of the impending chaos. Those smiles and congratulations feel fragile now. Everyone in the courtroom hears the echo of that silence. It hangs like a photograph frozen mid emotion. >> You know, I’mma give it to you, Mr. Dell. That would make an older man say,

“You know what? Look, if I’m going up with two young ones, might not be me, huh?” And yet you still voluntarily >> Yeah. >> agreed to help her with the baby. Ashley offers her rationale for not involving the grandparents sooner. She wanted to protect everyone until paternity was certain. The judge questions why she delayed disclosure and presses for honesty. Delk nods in approval of transparency while Jones watches stoically. The judge reminds Ashley that communication is not optional here.

>> I’ve moved downtown in the heart of the DMZ, Bullet City, just so I could be close where her mama and her can have a relationship. She lives with me. Joe Harrison Senior reiterates his attachment to Jasmine and details the ways his family has supported her. He talks about small rituals and visits that made him a grandfather in all but paperwork. Those memories tug at impartial listeners now facing technical results. Love is present regardless of biology. He insists. >> If she’s not, then life goes on as it

already is. I keep my married life and I go on doing my own thing. >> Mr. Harrison, how about you? What are your hopes for today? Well, I I’m hoping that if uh Jasmine is not my granddaughter, well, she can still call me grandfather. >> Ashley recounts the arc with Jones from teenage beginnings to separate trials as adults. Trust ruptured long ago, and the pregnancy reopened old wounds. Her confessions are raw, his bewilderment is visible. Judge Lake calls on them to consider Jasmine’s welfare above their

feelings. The courtroom hums with the sense of collateral damage. >> I want the father to step up. I want to know who her father is so they can step up to the plate. >> Okay. And before I go to these envelopes, let me say something. I need you to first of all understand that being here today is not just about you coming up with some checks and some money. The judge admonishes everyone to take responsibility and to prepare for definitive testing. Delk is told to continue supporting the child if he

chooses. Jones is urged to show up in ways that matter. Whatever the result, the Harrison clan is cautioned to temper celebration with patience. Ashley is reminded to push for the test she set in motion. >> Not several, but seven different men that came to my home to either pick her up or drop her off or called my phone or came and just stood outside my house. >> Envelopes finally arrive and the room holds its breath. Faces go taut. Joan statuesque del swallowing. Ashley twisting her fingers. Harrison senior

praying quietly. The clerk places the first result on the bench and Judge Lake reads with methodical calm. The syllables fall and a visible shift ripples through the audience. >> In the case of Alustin versus Jones Delt Harrison pertaining to whether Mr. Jones or Mr. Delulk is the father of 2-year-old Jasmine Alustin [music] that the biological father is Mr. Delulk. [applause] >> As each paper is opened, reactions cascade relief, shock, grief, and acceptance in different measures. Tears

are shed, jaws drop, hugs form and break. >> Daddy, having that baby for a while. >> It bought the woman out of me. Yeah, it did. [laughter] >> Look, I bet you were multitasking and everything, right? >> Yeah. >> Well, I’ll tell you what. >> Judge Lake reminds them results settle biology, but not the love already shown. Whatever the verdict, Jasmine now has a village complicated, imperfect, and real. >> Maybe Jasmine’s got a village. >> Oh, yeah.

>> And I want you to understand that that baby’s counting [music] on you. All right. I know. >> You okay? >> Good. I wish you the best of luck. Court is a journey. >> Is lied enters the courtroom carrying 26 years of unanswered questions. She has always believed Mr. Ellis is her father and cannot understand his denial. Judge Lake frames the conflict immediately with calm authority. A daughter raised without him and a mother accused of vanishing. An old DNA test sits at the

center of this emotional storm. >> You say that for 26 years you have known only one man, the defendant, Mr. Ellis [music] to be your biological father and you’re devastated that he is claiming you’re not [music] his? >> Yes, your honor. >> Danielle Ly speaks first and her pain is unmistakable. She says she never had a relationship with Mr. Ellis growing up. Her childhood moved through group homes and foster care with no father figure. The absence left scars that still show.

Mr. Ellis responds with accusations about her mother disappearing for weeks. A comment about skin tone follows and the room stiffens. >> The man she believes is her biological father. How does that make you feel? I feel for her, no, but I’m I’m not her father. I mean, her mother, she disappears weeks at a time out there partying. I mean, look bright as she is. I mean, I ain’t no doctor or nothing. >> Judge Lake shuts down the appearance argument instantly. She reminds everyone

that babies come in many shades. The courtroom exhales his order is restored. Mr. Ellis admits intimacy with Danielle’s mother. He says there was no protection used during their relationship, but he insists she was seeing other men at the same time. Doubt is the shield he clings to. However, what you’re saying is her mother also was having sex and intimate relationships with other men during that time. >> Yes, your honor. >> And what proof [music] do you have of that? Do you recall?

>> The only proof I have is by her disappearing weeks at a time, your honor. That’s why I called the the court. >> Pressed for clarity, Mr. Ellis explains the source of his doubt. He claims Danielle’s mother would vanish for long stretches. Judge Lake leans in and asks for specifics. This is the doubt she wants explained. The gallery grows quiet as tension builds. Everyone senses a major reveal is coming. So, wouldn’t you want to keep some kind of information or record so if I did grow up and I had

questions? You >> No, I would not I would not want to keep that kind of information. The only information I needed was I took that piece of paper down to child services. >> Mr. Ellis drops his bombshell confidant. He says a previous DNA test showed a 99.9% exclusion. According to him, child support stopped immediately after. He claims money was even returned to him. He presents this as proof the case was settled years ago. Danielle’s face freezes in disbelief. Danielle’s biological father.

>> Yes, I’m just >> Thank you so much. That’s what I wanted to know. You may be seated. Thank you, ma’am. So, Mr. Ellis, she says the test confirmed that you were Danielle’s biological father. You say it said the exact opposite. >> Danielle responds with one piercing question. If that paper existed, why was she never told? She says she grew up believing her father simply rejected her. Mr. Ella shrugs and says he only cared about the payment stopping. The answer lands like a punch to the chest.

Hurt and confusion wash over Danielle’s face. >> Who people are saying is my biological father. >> Yes. And I want to know who he is and how he operates. >> That’s because your mother keep putting those. >> Did you make an attempt to get to know his family at all? >> Judge Lake calls Danielle’s mother to the stand. The goal is to unravel the mystery of the old DNA test. The mother states a test was done through juvenile court. Her memory is the opposite of Mr.

Ellis’s claim. She insists the results showed he was the father. The room buzzes with disbelief. I feel like cuz me I’m a mom and I feel like if you are old enough to like what you guys went through was not my fault and you guys should never have involved me in anything that you guys were going through. >> Judge Lake pauses to absorb the contradiction. Two people recall the same test with opposite outcomes. She turns back to Mr. Ellis and asks how support stopped if he was confirmed the

father. He repeats that the garnishment ended and money was refunded. Danielle asks if she ever received support at all. The question hangs heavy in the air. the relationship with your father. >> I feel like if I had a male role model, then you know, I wouldn’t have to go out there and experience things I experienced looking for love in a man. Like, I should have had that firm man connection bond to where I know what to look in a man. >> Attention shifts to Danielle’s childhood

experience. Judge Lake asks if she was told Mr. Ellis was her father despite his absence. Danielle answers yes without hesitation. She explains how painful that belief was growing up. a child thinking her father chose not to love her. The courtroom grows somber >> and I got pregnant with my first son. And that’s what made me realize, hey, you know, I got to change my life. I’m going to end up, you know, away or dead. And so, I feel like I had to teach myself how to love myself and, you know,

change myself. >> Danielle shares that she tried connecting with Mr. Ellis’s relatives. Some welcomed her with open arms. She says she resembles them and felt a sense of belonging. That resemblance became emotional evidence for her. It wasn’t scientific, but it mattered deep. Her voice cracks as she speaks >> and said, “This is her brother. I want her to know her.” Miss Ellis, what I want to understand is at the point you see this DNA test result, [music] I never saw a DNA.

>> You didn’t see it? >> No, ma’am. He told me. >> Mr. Ellis continues pointing to the mother’s alleged behavior. Judge Lake cuts through the noise and demands facts. Dates, documents, and proof are what matter now. The conflicting DNA memories cannot resolve themselves. The court needs a clean answer. A new test is the only path forward. >> And I want to introduce myself like, you know, I’m Mr. Ellis’s daughter. She told me, “Get out of my face or I will smack

you.” >> Miss Ellis, do you remember this incident on the trolley? >> She’s lying. This little girl slid up. Teenager. She said, “Hi.” I said, “Hello. Do you know me?” I said, “No.” >> Judge Lake explains the logic carefully. If support stopped, perhaps the system recorded a non-paternity result. But if the mother remembers confirmation, something went wrong. Files could have been mixed or records misread. Today’s technology leaves no room for doubt. The

courtroom feels a sense of relief. >> Saw anything yet. >> You have to understand, Mr. Ellis. Her point is she’s been told her whole life you are her biological father. You say you had proof that she was not, but she hasn’t seen the proof. I want to see you with my own eyes. >> That’s why I called the courts. >> That’s why we’re here. >> Danielle stands firm despite her emotions. She says she is here for truth, not fantasy. Her voice trembles as she describes a difficult upbringing.

She has carried this question her entire life. Closure matters more than comfort. Even the gallery feels her weight. >> And if in fact it was determined that you were her biological father, then I’m wondering why in the world didn’t the state order child support. And why didn’t she ever get it? This is why this is all such a mystery. So I want to call upon an attorney in your home state. >> The earlier skin tone comment still lingers uncomfortably. Judge Lake reminds everyone that science does not

guess. Paternity is not decided by appearance or assumptions. The envelope will speak clearly. The room grows silent as results approach. Every breath feels loud. >> Is a result that is a positive result. Surely the state is going to try to locate the father and obtain child support, right? >> Absolutely. Child support is not for the mother to wave. >> Judge Lake reviews the timeline one last time. A long relationship marked by instability and absence. A daughter caught in the middle for decade.

Identity and family hang in the balance. Danielle grips her hands tightly. Mr. Ellis avoids eye contact. >> These results were prepared by DNA Diagnostics and they read as follows. [music] In the case of lied versus Ellis, when it comes to 26-year-old Danielle lied, it has been determined by this court. >> The court reaches its final moment. Judge Lake makes it clear speculation ends now. This is not about blame or past mistakes. It is about biological truth. Jerome enters with the envelope.

The paper crackles sharply. >> Mr. Ellis, you are the father. >> Whoa. I knew it. >> Yes. [cheering] >> Judge Lake opens the results and reads aloud. Emotion explodes instantly across the room. One side reels while the other absorbs the impact. Tears fall and faces hard and 26 years collapse into a single sentence. The truth finally lands and changes everything. >> Grandma. >> Yes, ma’am. >> You said that wasn’t one of yours, but it is. >> No, it’s not.

>> It is. The DNA has spoken. You don’t believe the DNA testing? >> Not that one. No. >> Well, [music] Miss Ellis, I’ll say this. >> Walking into court, M. Love appears worn but determined, holding four children’s worth of history and a tiny two-month-old named Winter. Her boyfriend, Mr. Hilton, insists he’s not the baby’s father, and the room buzzes with the weight of that refusal. She paints a picture of abandonment and hardship. He replies with allegations

that she was intimate with another man before the pregnancy. The stakes feel enormous financial ruin, fractured family, and a newborn’s identity hanging in the balance. Judge Lelay calls the session to order and signals she wants clear facts, not theater. >> Miss Love, you are in court today to prove Mr. Hilton is the biological father of your two-month-old daughter, Winter. That Mr. Hilton has denied your daughter since birth. >> From the very start, Miss Love’s voice trembles as she lists what she’s lost

while trying to make ends meet alone. Her words land heavy. house, car stability, and she says he did nothing to help. Mr. Hilton sits rigid, unwilling to meet her eyes, stating flatly he will not raise a child who isn’t biologically his. Spectators exchange looks everyone understands this argument isn’t just legal. It’s existential. The judge asks for timelines and starts putting dates on the table. >> He’s a dabby dad. He He doesn’t take care of the kids at all. He does

nothing. I’ve lost everything. I lost my house, my car. I I I’m financially I I’m just destroyed. >> Mr. Hilton’s posture hardens when he refuses responsibility, repeating that he won’t parent a child that isn’t his by blood. It stuns listeners to learn they already share four children together. Yet, he still bulks at claiming winner. Ms. Love replies that those older children prove his capability and pass promises, and the courtroom feels the irony. Emotions flip between betrayal and disbelief on both

sides. Legal counsel takes notes while judges and jurors observe human damage. >> Can you look at Mr. Hilton and talk to him. Tell him how this makes you feel. >> I loved you so much and you just keep doing this to our family. It don’t make no sense. I look at her. She needs her dad. >> Judge Lake turns to Miss Love and demands she address Hilton directly to explain what she needs from him. Tears spill as she tells him she loved him and the children need a father in their lives, pleading for him to stand up

until the truth is known. Hilton barely blinks and calls the display an act, accusing her of performance for sympathy. The emotional contrast is starker pleading vulnerability against his sculpted denial. The judge presses for evidence, not theater. >> Okay, so all in November, we were having sex. Then we end up Thanksgiving, we we stop talking. I end up meeting another guy. [music] December the 1st, you know, me and that guy, we had sex with a condom. But the whole November, men actually had sex. When the subject of

baby features comes up, Hilton points at Winter’s large eyes as if that settles paternity. The courtroom murmurs. Judge Lake reminds everyone that appearances are not DNA. She instructs the clerk to run conception dates instead of body part arguments. Mr. Hilton scoffs, but the judge’s reminder forces a shift from opinion back to timelines. A conception calculator and obstetric estimates now become central. >> I remember the last time was November the 15th. That’s the last time you

>> November the 15th in your mind. >> Yes, ma’am. >> All right. So, the only way to figure out if that is the right timing is to go to the conception calculator, which I have here. Miss Love produces a calendar marking encounters, asserting November was a month of unprotected intimacy that guarantees Hilton’s potential paternity. She admits meeting another man December 1st, but insists they use protection that time. Hilton counters that his last encounter was mid- November and claims

that Gap puts conception outside his window. The judge listens, translating their stories into a framework that science can examine. >> He immediately said that was not my baby. He said it’s no way possible. He said he googled it and it don’t it don’t make sense that that’s his baby at all. He said the timeline do not match. He said you can get pregnant in a week and it come back positive. >> The judge inputs winter’s due date and the courtroom waits as the calculator

estimates conception windows. Hilton protests calling internet timelines unreliable, but Judge Lake emphasizes that this method is a measured tool used to focus testing. Ms. Love recounts how Hilton immediately dismissed the pregnancy as Nah using a quick internet check an indignity she remembers vividly. The judge frowns at the cavalier use of Google as paternal proof >> just to see just to see like if it’s mine or not as if it look like me or similar to my other kids and I don’t I

don’t see it. So I just don’t believe it cuz she done lied before plenty of times. Still she laughing. >> Really? >> Miss Love explains how neglected she felt during pregnancy doctor visits alone, nights without support and the eventual birth without him present. Hilton claims he arrived later to see if the baby looked like him. An admission that cuts deep for Miss Love. Witnesses whisper about the ethics of attendance and presence versus biological connection. The judge asks whether even

amid doubt a caretaker might still step up to support the infant. His silence is telling. And then number two, when it comes with a new baby, he still hasn’t even forgiven you for the fact that you slept with the guy. That alone for him, >> we wasn’t even together. They had nothing to do with him. >> Returning to dates, Judge Lake reviews the November pattern of unprotected encounters and notes the protected December contact falls outside the likely window. The math begins to favor

Miss Love’s account in the eyes of some observers. You can see Mr. Hilton calculating his composed mask slipping into uneasy thought. Ms. Love’s voice steadies as she reiterates her certainty. The child is Hilton’s. The courtroom atmosphere tightens into focused anticipation. >> This baby don’t look the way I think the baby should look. It’s not mine. So you’re saying from that point on, Miss Love it, he’s doing nothing for the baby? >> Nothing at all whatsoever. And

>> he signed the birth certificate. He didn’t sign anything. He weren’t even at the hospital. >> Miss Love’s plea grows more urgent. She insists all her children are Hiltons and that she needs his support for winter, too. The pain in her voice makes the gallery fall quiet. Judge Lake offers a compassionate reminder that regardless of biology, a child needs stability, and both adults must consider the child’s best interest. Hilton maintains his disbelief, but cannot fully deny the

emotional gravity of her words. The judge presses forward toward objective resolution. >> WAIT A MINUTE. WAIT A MINUTE. Wait a minute. You the joke. >> Okay. Well, we going to find out when the results come. That’s awesome. >> So, Miss Love it, I want to understand this. You’ve had four, possibly five children with Mr. Hilton. >> Hilton digs in on the timing again, swearing his memory that mid- November was the last time they were intimate and that anything after that was impossible.

Judge Lake methodically contrasts his protest with the obstetric timeline, which places conception firmly within November’s window. His resistance shifts from factual to fear driven. Visible in how his hands clench at the podium. The prosecution and defense lean in this is the hinge point. Okay. >> You ain’t on nothing. >> All right. >> You don’t take accountability for nothing. You don’t take responsibility for nothing. >> See, look at that head. Look at his

head. You look like the baby got a received. >> That’s his baby. >> Predictably, the who looks like who showdown erupts with Hilton listing facial features he claims don’t match his. As if shopping for heredity would suffice. Judge Lake reminds the courtroom that resemblance is unreliable and not determinative. She calls for a practical step. Order DNA testing and let the laboratory provide a definitive answer. the court braces as the procedural machinery begins moving. >> It’s called I Google it’s a Mongolian

spot. When they get older, there it is, your honor. Identical. One is Winter and one is my other child. They’re [music] identical. It goes away when they’re little, like when they grow older. >> The testimony also reveals Hilton’s limited involvement during pregnancy, fewer hospital visits, absence at critical moments, and a general pattern of disengagement. While paternity remains disputed, Miss Love’s story about shouldering hardship resonates with many in the room. Judge Lake notes

that uncertainty doesn’t have to equal abandonment. Adults can still choose to support a child pending definitive results. The moral weight hangs over the legal step. >> Well, Miss Love it, you’re concerning me because it’s like you keep going after him and he’s this and he’s that and he’s this and all I keep coming BACK TO IS WHY DO YOU KEEP HAVING BABIES BY HIM? AFTER CONSOLIDATING TESTIMONY, Judge Lake summarizes the key facts. Repeated unprotected encounters in November, a

later protected encounter with another man, and a due date consistent with November conception. She frames the next step clearly. DNA testing will resolve biology, and the adults must plan for the child’s welfare. Meanwhile, a hush envelops the courtroom as everyone prepares for the moment of truth. Anticipation builds like static, >> impregnating the woman. You know she loves you. You know she wants to be with you and you sitting here bringing children in the world that DON’T EVEN

HAVE THE BENEFIT. >> Jerome walks in with the envelopes, each sealed and carrying weight far beyond paper. Ms. Love clasps her hands and bows her head. Hilton stares stiffly ahead as if to anchor himself. The judge reminds both sides that results will change lives and to temper their reactions with care. She opens the first envelope with deliberate calm, reading each word aloud. The room leans forward collectively. >> That’s her fault. YOU >> NO, IT AIN’T YOUR FAULT. IT’S NOT HER

FAULT. YOU KNOW WHO FAULT. >> YOU BE QUIET WHEN I’M TALKING CUZ YOU’VE BEEN TALKING THROUGH FIVE BABIES and he ain’t listened to another thing you said. So I’m talking now. >> The first result lands like a physical blow and the chamber faces respond with immediate visceral reactions. Gasps, tears, shock, a shaky laugh or two. Ms. Love looks like she can breathe for the first time in months. Hilton’s features shift with the impact of the reading denial warps into a new, more

complicated expression. The judge allows a pause for emotion before continuing. I done BEEN AROUND THE BLOCK SO MANY TIMES. I OWN the block. [applause] >> You’re wrong. And I’m not going to sit up in here with the t cry and tell you tell you to your face. You’re dead wrong. >> Finally, the conclusive announcement is made and the courtroom rearranges itself around that truth. Some bodies slump in relief while others tighten into acceptance or grief. Judge Lake outlines the legal consequences that follow.

>> And you get on your children’s birth certificates and you do what you’re supposed to do. And we gonna see what we gonna do about this other one, too. Give me the envelope, Jerome. Sit up here. And got [cheering] all these babies in the world with no name on it. Do they Did you give him his last name? >> Reminding them that biology determines certain responsibilities, but cannot erase the ongoing need for love and care. She urges the adults to focus on Winter’s best interests and to seek

counseling if needed. Outside, life will resume with new arrangements and old lessons learned. In the case of Love It versus Hilton, [music] when it comes to twomon winter love it, Mr. Hilton, you are not the father. >> I I know at least six that that she’s been with. So, so there’s no reason to fake. >> He believes that. >> I believe you’ve been with more than six. I believe you’ve been with 13. >> Then again, he >> 16. >> I go to the window. She’s hop She’s

hopping in the uh car with another man. I knew I mean I seen his hair, you know, flat top box. That’s not a white. >> That’s crazy. He’s so delusional. I don’t know where he’s getting this stuff from. So you weren’t getting in the car with the other man. Not >> true at all. >> That was Jose. >> No. >> Raquel enters the courtroom exhausted, clutching years of hurt and a pair of toddlers in her wake. Shawn sits across, rigid and convinced one twin is not

biologically his. The whole family’s future hangs on a simple but devastating question. Judge Lauren calls the case and demands straight answers from both parents. The room hums with tension as memories begin to surface. >> Miss Miller, you are here in hopes to save your family. You say Mr. Brewer’s paternity denial of your twins has led you to pack up, move out, and relocate to another state. You have opened this case to prove to the defendant that he is the father and put your family back

together. Is that correct? >> Yes, your honor. From the start, Shawn declares his certainty that Zayn is his and that Zara looks unfamiliar to him. Raquel insists both children were conceived during their relationship and pleads for fairness. Their voices often cross, revealing pain more than proof. Judge Lauren nudges them towards specific states, texts, and timelines. Emotional testimony begins to fill the gaps where documents don’t reach. >> I had the babies. Our relationship has

been on the rock. So, I’m just here to prove [music] that the twins are indeed his baby. >> It’s not the twins that were in question. It’s just Zara. It’s not the It’s not Zayn and Zara. It’s just Zara. >> So, there is You have fraternal twins. >> Yes. >> And you say only one child is in question. >> Yes. They tell how their story began. A summer cruise romance that felt like fate, followed by an Instagram reconnection years later. Passion faded

into suspicion as missteps accumulated and trust eroded. Raquel admits there were rough nights and poor choices, but denies any betrayal that would explain a different father. Shawn, however, clings to rumors and occasional absences as anchors for his doubt. The witnesses shift uncomfortably as the past is parsed. >> So, I’m in Oklahoma now because the way he treats our baby. >> What’s going on? I can see you are emotional. What’s going on? >> So, um, when I first got pregnant with

the twins, everything was cool. Sean was there for me. Everything was good. And all of a sudden, he kind of switched up when he seen Zara. >> Zara, she doesn’t even really look like me. >> Mr. Brewer, you this doubt is eating away at you. >> Yeah. >> One allegation lands hard. Shawn recounts a rumor about a man named Jose who allegedly took Raquel away for days at a time. Raquel laughs it off as nonsense. Yet, the accusation leaves a bruise nobody can ignore. Judge Lauren

orders witnesses to speak plainly and not trade barroom gossip. Friends and neighbors testify about comingings and goings, but their recollections are hazy and inconsistent. The court realizes anecdote cannot replace evidence. when we met. Well, we met uh on a cruise [music] and then you know we got together. I thought she was I’m like, “Oh, she’s fine and everything.” We got together >> and I didn’t want to talk to him first. I gave him the wrong number. >> Well, we talked we [laughter]

>> Oh, WELL, HOW DID YOU FIND her if you gave him the wrong number? >> He stalked me and he found me. >> I didn’t stalk. >> Did she give you the wrong number, Mr. Brewer? >> She did give me the wrong number, but I’m a chef. She was like, “Well, even if nothing don’t happen, you can cook for me.” >> Sean produces a cache of old messages and photos found on Raquel’s phone. Some contain flirtatious exchanges with other men. Raquel insists those texts are

years old and taken out of context. Judge Lauren warns that past flirtations don’t automatically mean paternity was compromised. Emotions flare as both sides fight to control the narrative. The atmosphere becomes taught like a violin string pulled too tight. >> So where did all this go wrong, Mr. Brewer? >> So one night she was drinking heavily and everything and she told me, “Oh, I cheated on you with a guy named Jose.” >> I don’t know no Jose. And she tell me

something. >> The only Jose I know is Joseé Quo. I don’t know what he >> Well, that must be Zara Quo then, you know, cuz >> Okay then. [laughter] >> So, she told you she cheated on you with a guy named Jose. >> Raquel explains how the pregnancy unfolded and how she believes Shawn would be elated. She describes prenatal appointments, hopes for a stable family, and the nights she felt alone. Shawn remembers those months differently, citing her secrecy and unexplained

absences. Each retelling deepens the emotional divide and the children’s welfare drifts into the background. The judge reminds them this case is about the kids, not revenge. >> She left. We were driving or something and she had to move the car. So, I did look in her phone and I found penis pictures. >> Those were old like way before I met him. >> That that was in October. We had got together in July. >> Wow. >> So, Miss Miller, did you have penis pictures in your phone?

>> I did, but they were like they were really old. like he had to go back in the text and look at it like way back. >> When the twins were born, Shawn claimed Zara’s complexion and features immediately triggered his suspicion. Raquel counters by pointing to family resemblance with other relatives and insists children of the same parents can vary widely. The courtroom hears from genetic basics and common patterns and sibling appearance. Judge Lawrence steers the parties away from speculative

comparisons. Science, she says, will be the ultimate arbiter. and her leaving for three days at a time. >> You know, her popping off the rubber and all of this stuff and Jose and the cars just >> So, Miss Miller, Mr. Brewer said the little shady ass. >> Yeah, Mr. Brewer is delusional. Half the stuff he says is not true. >> It’s not? >> Yeah, it’s not true at all. >> So, who is Jose? >> I told you I don’t know nobody named Jose. >> Shawn explains he signed Zayn’s birth

certificate but withheld signing Zara. A move that chills Raquel to the bone. That decision became a wedge that grew into an ocean between them. Judge Lauren asks why such crucial paperwork was left incomplete if Shawn truly wanted a family united. Answers are halting and reveal more hurt than clarity. The legal implications begin to stack up. >> Damn, they’re white. I’m like, that’s not my baby. She look Mexican weird. >> She don’t look nothing like me. >> Your honor, Mr. Black people can come in

any shade or color. >> I’m glad you said it cuz I say it over and over again in this courtroom. Nobody listens to me except Jerome. Your honor, he signed Zayn’s birth certificate, but didn’t sign Zara. >> To lighten the tension, a moment of absurdity emerges. Shawn points to tiny details like a toe shape, as if that proves lineage. The gallery reacts with a mix of amusement and horror at the idea of forensic pediatrics. Raquel rolls her eyes and counters with how everyday little resemblances mean

nothing without science. Judge Lauren calls for civility and reminds everyone that DNA testing will resolve physical rumors. >> This evidence states what, Mr. Brewer? One in 400 twins uh can be born by paternal. >> Double paternity is not uncommon. Medical research over the past 30 years has uncovered that super ficandation or double paternity is not as rare as previously thought. >> Raquel describes how the parental favoritism crept in. More photos with Zayn, more cuddles on camera, and fewer

moments captured with Zara. Those small slights became a constant ache she could not ignore. Shawn protests that he loves both children, but claims he struggles to bond with Zara. The judge observes how a child senses distance and asks both parents to consider the emotional consequences regardless of bloodline. The courtroom grows quiet >> over to the uh monitor and show me what >> Thank you. >> I HOPE YOU DIDN’T COME TO COURT with them raggedy feet. >> No. So, this is my crusty foot.

>> Yeah. [laughter] >> But as you can see, the toe curves like a sea like and it lays under. Zayn’s toe is just exactly like mine. It It kind of cur It’s not as crusty, but it curves under like that. Like that. >> Thank you, Lord. Uh-huh. >> And then Zara’s toe, as you can see, goes straight up. The couple’s living arrangements unravel in testimony. Raquel moves states to escape the coldness. While Shawn says he flew in to visit, but was kept at arms length.

Their remembrances of who did what for birthdays and Dr. Visit’s conflict sharp. Judge Lauren notes that in messy relationships, people sometimes fail to see the bigger picture, how the children pay the price. Both parents look weary at the thought. >> Tell you what kind of relationship he has. He whenever we go out and stuff when we were together, he would always take pictures with Zayn and like always hold Zayn in a bunch of pictures. He rarely take pictures with Zara. >> And this has upset you so much that you

just decided to pack up and leave. You’re a new mother. >> Or what if she leaving because it’s the truth? >> Legal council presses the obvious solution. Order immediate paternity test for both twins so uncertainty cannot poison parenting further. Both sides resist a little fear of truth as a powerful force, but they ultimately agree. The judge schedules the testing and reminds them the lab is impartial and definitive. Preparations begin and the courtroom waits for science to break

the stalemate. >> Zara look like her when she been drinking quervo. >> Leave them babies alone. Right. So, the truth is you really have not accepted Zara. You just don’t believe she’s yours. >> I do not believe Zara is my baby. >> And I can see when you look at your babies, Miss Miller, this bothers you. >> It does. It bothers me a lot because I feel for them and they notice when one is being treated a little different from the other one. They could pick up on

that. >> Jerome returns with sealed envelopes and the air changes heavy with anticipation. Raquel clasps her hands, trying to steady her breath for the moment that might restore or shatter her family. Shawn’s jaw tightens as he steals himself for whatever reality reveals. The judge reads the first result slowly, allowing each syllable to settle in the room like thunder. Eyes dart and hands clutch. and you had be two beautiful twins you thought and you had this doubt so much so that you’re doing research

finding out that there is a more likely chance than we think [music] that twins could be bipaternal. This is a lot to just have new babies that are just 13 months old. You all should still be in the the bliss of everything. >> When the first verdict is announced, relief washes over one corner of the room and tension snaps in another Zay’s result confirms paternity. Cheers are quietly stifled, tears peek out, and shadows of past arguments flicker through Shawn’s expression. He exhales

as if a load is half removed from his chest, but the second envelope still awaits. The family braces a new for the conclusive outcome. >> I wasn’t getting no help, so I left. >> I think I think the reason why you left is cuz that baby is not mine. Zara, >> well, we going to find out today. We going to find out right now. In the case of Miller versus Brewer, when it comes to 13mon-old Zane Brewer, [music] it has been determined by this court. Mr. Brewer, you are the father.

>> The second declaration arrives and with it an audible inhalation from everyone present the lab affirms Shawn is the father of Zara as well. A stunned silence breaks into sobs, apologies, and trembling laughter. Raquel throws herself forward and Shawn’s composure collapses into tears in a shaky embrace. Judge Lauren allows the moment then gently urges the adults to begin repairing what years of doubt strain. >> Result is for Zara. In the case of Miller versus Brewer, when it comes to

13mon-old Zara Brewer, it has been determined by this court. Mr. Brewer, you are the father. In the aftermath, apologies are offered and accepted, imperfect and immediate. Shawn proposes a commitment to rebuild trust and to be present for both children. Raquel tenatively accepts, recognizing that truth has given them a chance to men. Judge Lauren outlines follow-up steps, custody, paperwork, counseling, referrals, and a stern reminder that children need constancy above all. The courtroom empties with

families meaning to try again. >> Really? >> Yeah. >> Other hand. Other hand. [laughter] A see >> I’mma tell you what I’m going to get you for your engagement gift and your wedding gift. A pedicure, honey, CUZ YOU AIN’T GOING TO SHOW UP. [laughter] >> Picture a decade long marriage filled with doctor visits, prayers, and patients. Finally blessed with a baby boy. Instead of celebration, the arrival sparks accusations and suspicion. That is the storm surrounding Hammond versus

Hammond. Today, Mrs. Hammond swears baby Isaac is her husband’s long-awaited miracle. Mr. Hammond believes betrayal shadows the joy. And you claimed that after 10 years of marriage and repeated attempts to get pregnant, a month ago, you finally gave birth to your miracle baby, Isaac. You need today’s results prove to the defendant, your husband, that this is his baby. Is this correct? >> Yes, your [music] honor. >> In the opening moments, the courtroom feels electric and uneasy. Judge Lake

barely finishes introductions before Mr. Hammond unloads allegations. He claims several men admitted to being involved with his wife. He even insists there are videos proving it. Mrs. Hammond’s stunned expression says every >> all we wanted was to have a baby and we finally got that and it’s sadly brought us further apart than bring us together >> all because of paternity doubt. >> Yes, ma’am. >> Mr. Hammond, you stand here with doubt today? >> Yes, ma’am. Um she’s um she’s had

multiple [music] partners and um she she lies to my face constantly. So So um how am I supposed to believe? >> Mrs. Hammond responds without hesitation and shocks the room. She admits infidelity happened on both sides of the marriage. Her tone is calm, almost resigned as she explains it spiraled after his first affair. Judge Lake’s face tightens at the honesty. The messiness escalates instantly. >> What did they tell you? What happened? >> I’ve I’ve seen a video of my wife giving

oral >> to to another man. >> That’s such a lie. >> There is no video, your honor. There is no video. >> But was there a man? Then was there oral sex? >> In in all honesty, um there has been cheating on both sides. My husband cheated on me first. I took it the wrong way. About a year after that happened, I did end up I I’ve cheated on him. >> The story deepens when Mrs. Hammond explains their move from California to Texas. She says it was meant to save

their marriage. Instead, while she was gone, his relatives encouraged him to see another woman. Hurt turned into retaliation and faithfulness collapsed completely. Judge Lake exhaled sharp, clearly unimpressed. >> And um when I had got back, I had found [music] out that his family had encouraged him being with somebody else. He was with somebody else while I [music] was gone. Um, at that point >> with somebody else >> at that point, we truly had been trying to work on our marriage [music] and it

was it was devastating to me. >> So, what did you do? >> Um, to be honest, um, I I did end up leaving Texas. I went back to California. >> Mr. Hammond then presents text messages as evidence. Jerome hands them to Judge Lake, who reads them aloud. The messages are flirtatious, affectionate, and loaded with emojis. The courtroom reacts with nervous laughter. Judge Lake Dryley notes those are not professional messages. >> Give me that evidence. Thank you. [music] This evidence,

>> it’s um conversations with my wife and another man that [music] that that should not be spoken. She’s in the same place as this man is. You know what I mean? And um >> and you posted these to your social media. >> Correct. >> You said, “How does your wife of 11 years text people she’s cheated on her husband with messages like this?” >> Mrs. Hammond tries to minimize the texts by calling them harmless meetups. Judge Lake cuts that down instantly. She

reminds everyone this is a courtroom, not a dating app. The judge states plainly that these messages did not appear innocent. The truth begins pressing closer. >> And I miss you already, too. And then the other man says, “Thank you for texting me. Can’t wait to see you again. Kiss hard kiss.” >> Right. >> This doesn’t sound too good, Miss Hammond. >> I’m I’m sure it doesn’t. I mean, I know what I have and what I haven’t done. Attention shifts to baby Isaac and

emotions rise. Mr. Hammond admits he was present for the birth. He also signed the birth certificate out of fear his family name would end. His voice cracks as he explains wanting to believe the child was his. Hope and doubt battle across his face. >> When Isaac is born, were you at the birth participate? >> I signed the birth certificate and and um I’m the last to to the the last Hammond. So if I don’t have a son, then my family’s name is done. So, um, so maybe I rushed to, uh, to want to be the

father. You know what I mean? >> I had let him know my water broke. >> Then another revelation drops hard. Mrs. Hammond claims her husband left the hospital during her labor. According to her, he went gambling at a casino. Gasps ripple through the courtroom. Judge Lake looks stunned by the timing of that choice. >> Didn’t show back up to the hospital until 20 minutes before I gave birth and [music] he he was there. He cut the umbilical cord. He um stayed for about maybe 45 minutes and he left again. I

didn’t see him until the next day. Mr. Hammond, you were at the casino with another woman while your wife was giving birth. >> I was at the casino gambling. I wasn’t with another woman. >> But why were you at the casino gambling if your wife’s giving birth to the baby you prayed for? >> Right. >> The argument turns into a tally and betrayals. Mrs. Hammond accuses him of cheating four times. Mr. Hammond counters that she slept with at least three men. The exchange feels less like

testimony and more like scorekeep. Judge Lake interrupts frustrated by the chaos. fix what we had [music] lost in the last couple years by the horrible things that have been done between the both of us. And [music] it just is devastating that our our son, you know, might have made myself happier and I don’t know what it did for him, but it definitely tore us apart even more. You know, this is sad. You know, I mean, if there’s this much cheating back and forth, there’s no way a relationship or a marriage can

withstand this. >> A new voice enters when Mrs. Hammond’s twin brother takes the stand. He confidently states Isaac resembles Mr. Hammond. He even brings photos to support his belief. His testimony feels hopeful rather than hostile. For a moment, both parents soften. >> Why are you saying these numbers? >> Because um she would tell me anything. I mean, I’ve been the the brunt of the joke many times. You know what I mean? So, it’s hard to to for her to say this is your child. I mean, the baby could

have came back Ethiopian [music] and she’s going to tell me how beautiful my baby is and I’m just >> That’s not true. >> It’s ridiculous. You know what I mean? Mrs. Hammond breaks down emotionally after hearing that support. She admits exhaustion from years of fighting. Her only desire now is peace and family unity. Judge Lakes’s tone softens in response. Beneath the damage, love is still visible. >> Right. Right. As far as paternity goes, they wanted it uh Isaac because they

thought it’d bring them closer together. And I think that’s what everyone was kind of hoping for, especially uh William over here. And as soon as Isaac was born, as much as William wanted to be a father, I think he was still uncertain about paternity, so he was kind of hesitant to get too involved with Isaac, perhaps. >> Mr. Hammond confesses his inner conflict. He says he loves his wife deeply, but cannot survive constant doubt. The uncertainty has poisoned his trust and peace. Judge Lake responds

bluntly about accountability. Trust once broken by both must be rebuilt deliberately. back and just try to look out for my nephew as much as possible and to help out as far as feeding him or changing diapers or whatever it takes. >> So, you’ve had to step up and basically be the dad instead of being the uncle. >> Yeah. Just try to participate in any way that I can to make sure Isaac gets what he needs. >> The courtroom grows silent as Judge Lake calls for DNA results. Hands tremble and

breaths are held. Both parents brace for lifealtering truth. The air feels impossibly heavy. Jerome steps forward with the envelope. >> Oh, your honor, there was nobody else to tell. That’s my husband and that’s his child. >> I don’t believe that, Kimberly. Facts. You You were in California multiple times. >> Yeah, I understand that. See, this is the problem when you let relationships get this messy because you might be telling the truth, but Lord only knows. >> Judge Lake reads carefully and

deliberately. Every word lands with impact. She announces Mr. Hammond as the biological father of Isaac. Attention snaps instantly. Emotions erupt across the room. >> Want this marriage and you want this fam? >> Yes, your honor. very badly. >> How about you, Mr. Hammond? I >> I would become a different father if I knew that this was my child. I mean, I’m not going to raise the next man’s [music] baby. You know what I mean? >> And so, you’re hoping that Isaac is

>> your biological child? >> I pray. >> You pray he is. >> Yes, ma’am. >> Mrs. Hammond sobbs with relief and gratitude. Mr. Hammond freezes, then exhales as reality sinks in. Judge Lake delivers final wisdom about protecting blessing. She urges them to abandon betrayal and rebuild together. for once the courtroom closes on hope. >> These results were prepared by DNA diagnostics and they read as follows. In the case of Hammond versus Hammond, when it comes to one month old Isaac

Hammond, it has been determined by this court. [music] Mr. Hammond, you are the father.