Why France Blamed The CIA For JFK’s Assassination SS

November 25th, 1963. Eliza Palas, Paris. President Charles de Gaulle had just returned from John F. Kennedy’s funeral in Washington. His information minister, Alan Perfeit, asked the question everyone wanted answered. What do you think happened to Kennedy? De Gaul’s response was immediate, cold, certain. What happened to him is what nearly happened to me.

The story is the same as mine. They got him with security forces. They killed him like a dog. Paraphied pressed further. Do you think Oswald was a front? De Gaul didn’t hesitate. Everything leads me to believe it. While America mourned and the Warren Commission prepared to conclude Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, the president of France, one of America’s closest allies, had reached a very different conclusion.

Kennedy was killed by his own security forces. A CIA backed coup, an American military conspiracy. If you want to understand why Charles de Gaulle immediately recognized JFK’s assassination as an inside job and why his analysis recorded but never published in English until 2002 remains one of the most damning assessments of Dallas. Hit that like button.

Because Deg Gaul wasn’t guessing, he knew because the CIA had tried to kill him first. Charles de Gaulle survived 31 assassination attempts between 1944 and 1966. Not metaphorical attacks, actual bullets, actual bombs, actual conspiracies organized by French military officers, intelligence operatives, and paramilitary groups who believed de Gaul was betraying France.

Why? Because de Gaulle wanted to end France’s brutal colonial war in Algeria. He promised Algerian independence. The French military and right-wing extremists were furious. So they formed the OAS organization Arma Secret, a terrorist paramilitary group composed of French intelligence officers, military commanders and colonialists.

They bombed, they assassinated, they planned coups, and they had support from French intelligence, from elements of the French military, and according to substantial evidence, from the CIA. The most serious attempt came on August 22nd, 1962. Pati Clamar, a Paris suburb. De Gaul’s motorcade was ambushed by OAS gunman led by Jean Bastian Tiri, an Air Force Lieutenant Colonel.

Machine gun fire. Over 150 rounds. De Gaulle’s Citroen ADS ra with bullets. Two tires blown out. Windows shattered. Miraculously, neither De Gaul nor his wife were hit. De Gaul survived. But the message was clear. Even the president of France was not safe from rogue security forces. April 21st, 1961. While the world focused on the Bay of Pigs disaster in Cuba, another coup was underway in France.

Four French generals, Maurice Sha, Andre Zeller, Raul Salon, and Edmund Juo seized control of Alier. They plan to march on Paris to overthrow de Gaul to keep Algeria French. Evidence suggests CIA director Alan Dulles encouraged the plot. According to French intelligence sources and later declassified documents, Dulles had been meeting with French right-wing elements for months.

He wanted De Gaul removed. Why? Because de Gaulle opposed American cold war strategy. He wanted an independent French nuclear deterrent. He criticized NATO. He was negotiating with the Soviets. In short, De Gaul wouldn’t obey Washington. So Washington, or at least elements within the CIA, tried to remove him.

When JFK learned of the coup, he was furious. According to multiple accounts, Kennedy told the French ambassador, “I stand in full support of President de Gaul.” But then Kennedy added something chilling. The CIA is such a vast and poorly controlled machine that the most unlikely maneuvers might be true. Translation: I’m not fully in control of my own intelligence agency.

Deg Gaul never forgot that Kennedy had admitted the CIA operated independently, that it defied presidential authority, that it staged coups without White House approval, and in April 1961, it had targeted France’s president. So when Charles de Gaulle heard that John F. Kennedy had been shot in Dallas by a supposed lone communist in a city crawling with security forces, he knew immediately what had happened.

because he’d lived it. In his conversation with Parapit, de Gaulle laid out the playbook. They got their hands on this communist who wasn’t one while still being one. He had a subpar intellect and was an exalted fanatic. Just the man they needed, the perfect one to be accused. Oswald the Patsy. Just like de Gaul’s assassins always had fall guys, extremists, fanatics, people with radical politics who could be blamed.

The guy ran away because he probably became suspicious. They wanted to kill him on the spot before he could be grabbed by the judicial system. Oswald fled the book depository, was arrested in a theater, and everyone expected him to be killed before interrogation. He wasn’t at first. Unfortunately, it didn’t happen exactly the way they had probably planned it would, but a trial, you realize, is just terrible.

People would have talked. They would have dug up so much. So they sent Jack Ruby, the cleanup man, two days later on live television. Problem solved. Then the security forces went looking for someone they totally controlled and who couldn’t refuse their offer. And that guy sacrificed himself to kill the fake assassin supposedly in defense of Kennedy’s memory.

Ruby’s explanation that he killed Oswald to spare Jackie Kennedy the trauma of a trial was absurd to de Gaulle. He’d seen the same pattern in France. Assassins silenced by other assassins. Trails that led nowhere. De Gaul predicted exactly how America would react. As soon as they succeed in wiping out the false assassin, they declare that the justice system no longer need be concerned.

That no further public action was needed now that the guilty perpetrator was dead. Better to assassinate an innocent man than to let a civil war break out. Better an injustice than disorder. And then the cover up. America is in danger of upheavalss. But you’ll see all of them together will observe the law of silence. They will close ranks.

They’ll do everything to stifle any scandal. They will throw Noah’s cloak over these shameful deeds in order to not lose face in front of the whole world. In order to not risk unleashing riots in the United States. in order to preserve the Union and to avoid a new civil war in order to not ask themselves questions.

They don’t want to know. They don’t want to find out. They won’t allow themselves to find out. De Gaul understood the logic perfectly because he’d done the same thing in France after his own assassination attempts. Quickly try conspirators. Execute ring leaders. Close the investigation. Move on. National security. National unity.

National survival. All required silence. November 25th, 1963. Washington, DC. Kennedy’s funeral. Charles de Gaulle attended along with other world leaders. He walked in the procession behind Kennedy’s casket. But de Gaulle was terrified, not of grief, of assassination. According to accounts from his security detail, de Gaulle believed the same forces that killed Kennedy might target foreign leaders at the funeral, eliminate multiple threats at once, blame it on communists, start World War II.

De Gaul’s bodyguards were on high alert. He insisted on minimal motorcade exposure. He wanted to leave Washington immediately after the ceremony. Why such paranoia? Because De Gaul knew if they could kill an American president, they could kill anyone. Was de Gaulle right? Did the CIA kill Kennedy? De Gaulle never provided hard proof, but his analysis was based on pattern recognition.

He’d survived 31 assassination attempts. He knew how security services operated. He knew how coups were staged. He knew how psies were selected and fall guys were silenced. And everything about Dallas fit the template. The psyald’s profile, ex-Marine, Soviet defector, communist sympathizer, was perfect for blame. Too perfect.

The location, Dallas, Texas, Southern Territory, right-wing stronghold, where local police could be controlled. The security failure. The motorcade route was published. The windows in the book depository were left open. Secret Service protocols were violated. The silencing Ruby killing Oswald on live TV preventing a trial, preventing testimony. The investigation.

Warren Commission staffed with establishment figures. Chief Justice Earl Warren, former CIA Director Alan Dulles, whom Kennedy had fired after the Bay of Pigs. The same Dulles who had plotted against De Gaul. The conclusion: Oswald acted alone. No conspiracy. Case closed. Move on.

De Gaul had seen it all before in France against him. French newspapers questioned the official narrative from the start. Leamand published articles doubting lone gunman theory. French intellectuals openly discussed conspiracy. French intelligence sdece conducted its own investigation. Their conclusion Kennedy was killed by American intelligence faction CIA military hardliners.

Right-wing extremists opposing peace initiatives. Why? Because they’d lived it. They’d seen CIA involvement in the 1961 coup. They’d seen how intelligence services operated outside control. They’d seen Alan Dulles up close. Alamperit published a Gaul’s comments in 2002, long after both men were dead. His memoir site de Gaulle became a French bestseller, but it was never translated to English, never published in America, unknown in the US for decades.

When David Talbet quoted them in the devil’s chessboard 2015, Americans finally learned France’s president believed JFK was killed by the CIA. Not Soviets, not Castro, not mafia, the CIA. De Gallal’s assessment carries weight because he survived 31 assassination attempts by security forces. He knew Alan Dulles personally.

He knew CIA had plotted against him. He understood how coups were staged. He recognized the pattern immediately. Was Charles de Gaulle right? We may never know definitively, but consider de Gaulle had no reason to lie in a private conversation with his information minister. His analysis was based on direct experience surviving similar attacks.

He predicted exactly how America would react. And he was right. French intelligence independently reached the same conclusion. The CIA has never released all files on Kennedy’s assassination 60 plus years later. If the official story is true, if Oswald really acted alone, why did America’s closest ally immediately conclude it was a coup? Why did the man who survived more assassination attempts than any modern leader recognize the pattern instantly? And why after 60 years are Americans still not allowed to see all the evidence? If this investigation made you

reconsider the official narrative, hit that like button. Share with anyone who thinks the Warren Commission told the truth. Subscribe for more investigations into what foreign leaders really believed about Dallas. Tell us, do you think de Gaulle was right? Did the CIA kill Kennedy? Because when the president of France, a man who survived 31 murder attempts, tells you he recognizes the playbook, maybe you should listen.

Thank you for watching and remember, sometimes the people who’ve been through it know exactly what they’re looking

November 25th, 1963. Eliza Palas, Paris. President Charles de Gaulle had just returned from John F. Kennedy’s funeral in Washington. His information minister, Alan Perfeit, asked the question everyone wanted answered. What do you think happened to Kennedy? De Gaul’s response was immediate, cold, certain. What happened to him is what nearly happened to me.

The story is the same as mine. They got him with security forces. They killed him like a dog. Paraphied pressed further. Do you think Oswald was a front? De Gaul didn’t hesitate. Everything leads me to believe it. While America mourned and the Warren Commission prepared to conclude Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, the president of France, one of America’s closest allies, had reached a very different conclusion.

Kennedy was killed by his own security forces. A CIA backed coup, an American military conspiracy. If you want to understand why Charles de Gaulle immediately recognized JFK’s assassination as an inside job and why his analysis recorded but never published in English until 2002 remains one of the most damning assessments of Dallas. Hit that like button.

Because Deg Gaul wasn’t guessing, he knew because the CIA had tried to kill him first. Charles de Gaulle survived 31 assassination attempts between 1944 and 1966. Not metaphorical attacks, actual bullets, actual bombs, actual conspiracies organized by French military officers, intelligence operatives, and paramilitary groups who believed de Gaul was betraying France.

Why? Because de Gaulle wanted to end France’s brutal colonial war in Algeria. He promised Algerian independence. The French military and right-wing extremists were furious. So they formed the OAS organization Arma Secret, a terrorist paramilitary group composed of French intelligence officers, military commanders and colonialists.

They bombed, they assassinated, they planned coups, and they had support from French intelligence, from elements of the French military, and according to substantial evidence, from the CIA. The most serious attempt came on August 22nd, 1962. Pati Clamar, a Paris suburb. De Gaul’s motorcade was ambushed by OAS gunman led by Jean Bastian Tiri, an Air Force Lieutenant Colonel.

Machine gun fire. Over 150 rounds. De Gaulle’s Citroen ADS ra with bullets. Two tires blown out. Windows shattered. Miraculously, neither De Gaul nor his wife were hit. De Gaul survived. But the message was clear. Even the president of France was not safe from rogue security forces. April 21st, 1961. While the world focused on the Bay of Pigs disaster in Cuba, another coup was underway in France.

Four French generals, Maurice Sha, Andre Zeller, Raul Salon, and Edmund Juo seized control of Alier. They plan to march on Paris to overthrow de Gaul to keep Algeria French. Evidence suggests CIA director Alan Dulles encouraged the plot. According to French intelligence sources and later declassified documents, Dulles had been meeting with French right-wing elements for months.

He wanted De Gaul removed. Why? Because de Gaulle opposed American cold war strategy. He wanted an independent French nuclear deterrent. He criticized NATO. He was negotiating with the Soviets. In short, De Gaul wouldn’t obey Washington. So Washington, or at least elements within the CIA, tried to remove him.

When JFK learned of the coup, he was furious. According to multiple accounts, Kennedy told the French ambassador, “I stand in full support of President de Gaul.” But then Kennedy added something chilling. The CIA is such a vast and poorly controlled machine that the most unlikely maneuvers might be true. Translation: I’m not fully in control of my own intelligence agency.

Deg Gaul never forgot that Kennedy had admitted the CIA operated independently, that it defied presidential authority, that it staged coups without White House approval, and in April 1961, it had targeted France’s president. So when Charles de Gaulle heard that John F. Kennedy had been shot in Dallas by a supposed lone communist in a city crawling with security forces, he knew immediately what had happened.

because he’d lived it. In his conversation with Parapit, de Gaulle laid out the playbook. They got their hands on this communist who wasn’t one while still being one. He had a subpar intellect and was an exalted fanatic. Just the man they needed, the perfect one to be accused. Oswald the Patsy. Just like de Gaul’s assassins always had fall guys, extremists, fanatics, people with radical politics who could be blamed.

The guy ran away because he probably became suspicious. They wanted to kill him on the spot before he could be grabbed by the judicial system. Oswald fled the book depository, was arrested in a theater, and everyone expected him to be killed before interrogation. He wasn’t at first. Unfortunately, it didn’t happen exactly the way they had probably planned it would, but a trial, you realize, is just terrible.

People would have talked. They would have dug up so much. So they sent Jack Ruby, the cleanup man, two days later on live television. Problem solved. Then the security forces went looking for someone they totally controlled and who couldn’t refuse their offer. And that guy sacrificed himself to kill the fake assassin supposedly in defense of Kennedy’s memory.

Ruby’s explanation that he killed Oswald to spare Jackie Kennedy the trauma of a trial was absurd to de Gaulle. He’d seen the same pattern in France. Assassins silenced by other assassins. Trails that led nowhere. De Gaul predicted exactly how America would react. As soon as they succeed in wiping out the false assassin, they declare that the justice system no longer need be concerned.

That no further public action was needed now that the guilty perpetrator was dead. Better to assassinate an innocent man than to let a civil war break out. Better an injustice than disorder. And then the cover up. America is in danger of upheavalss. But you’ll see all of them together will observe the law of silence. They will close ranks.

They’ll do everything to stifle any scandal. They will throw Noah’s cloak over these shameful deeds in order to not lose face in front of the whole world. In order to not risk unleashing riots in the United States. in order to preserve the Union and to avoid a new civil war in order to not ask themselves questions.

They don’t want to know. They don’t want to find out. They won’t allow themselves to find out. De Gaul understood the logic perfectly because he’d done the same thing in France after his own assassination attempts. Quickly try conspirators. Execute ring leaders. Close the investigation. Move on. National security. National unity.

National survival. All required silence. November 25th, 1963. Washington, DC. Kennedy’s funeral. Charles de Gaulle attended along with other world leaders. He walked in the procession behind Kennedy’s casket. But de Gaulle was terrified, not of grief, of assassination. According to accounts from his security detail, de Gaulle believed the same forces that killed Kennedy might target foreign leaders at the funeral, eliminate multiple threats at once, blame it on communists, start World War II.

De Gaul’s bodyguards were on high alert. He insisted on minimal motorcade exposure. He wanted to leave Washington immediately after the ceremony. Why such paranoia? Because De Gaul knew if they could kill an American president, they could kill anyone. Was de Gaulle right? Did the CIA kill Kennedy? De Gaulle never provided hard proof, but his analysis was based on pattern recognition.

He’d survived 31 assassination attempts. He knew how security services operated. He knew how coups were staged. He knew how psies were selected and fall guys were silenced. And everything about Dallas fit the template. The psyald’s profile, ex-Marine, Soviet defector, communist sympathizer, was perfect for blame. Too perfect.

The location, Dallas, Texas, Southern Territory, right-wing stronghold, where local police could be controlled. The security failure. The motorcade route was published. The windows in the book depository were left open. Secret Service protocols were violated. The silencing Ruby killing Oswald on live TV preventing a trial, preventing testimony. The investigation.

Warren Commission staffed with establishment figures. Chief Justice Earl Warren, former CIA Director Alan Dulles, whom Kennedy had fired after the Bay of Pigs. The same Dulles who had plotted against De Gaul. The conclusion: Oswald acted alone. No conspiracy. Case closed. Move on.

De Gaul had seen it all before in France against him. French newspapers questioned the official narrative from the start. Leamand published articles doubting lone gunman theory. French intellectuals openly discussed conspiracy. French intelligence sdece conducted its own investigation. Their conclusion Kennedy was killed by American intelligence faction CIA military hardliners.

Right-wing extremists opposing peace initiatives. Why? Because they’d lived it. They’d seen CIA involvement in the 1961 coup. They’d seen how intelligence services operated outside control. They’d seen Alan Dulles up close. Alamperit published a Gaul’s comments in 2002, long after both men were dead. His memoir site de Gaulle became a French bestseller, but it was never translated to English, never published in America, unknown in the US for decades.

When David Talbet quoted them in the devil’s chessboard 2015, Americans finally learned France’s president believed JFK was killed by the CIA. Not Soviets, not Castro, not mafia, the CIA. De Gallal’s assessment carries weight because he survived 31 assassination attempts by security forces. He knew Alan Dulles personally.

He knew CIA had plotted against him. He understood how coups were staged. He recognized the pattern immediately. Was Charles de Gaulle right? We may never know definitively, but consider de Gaulle had no reason to lie in a private conversation with his information minister. His analysis was based on direct experience surviving similar attacks.

He predicted exactly how America would react. And he was right. French intelligence independently reached the same conclusion. The CIA has never released all files on Kennedy’s assassination 60 plus years later. If the official story is true, if Oswald really acted alone, why did America’s closest ally immediately conclude it was a coup? Why did the man who survived more assassination attempts than any modern leader recognize the pattern instantly? And why after 60 years are Americans still not allowed to see all the evidence? If this investigation made you

reconsider the official narrative, hit that like button. Share with anyone who thinks the Warren Commission told the truth. Subscribe for more investigations into what foreign leaders really believed about Dallas. Tell us, do you think de Gaulle was right? Did the CIA kill Kennedy? Because when the president of France, a man who survived 31 murder attempts, tells you he recognizes the playbook, maybe you should listen.

Thank you for watching and remember, sometimes the people who’ve been through it know exactly what they’re looking

November 25th, 1963. Eliza Palas, Paris. President Charles de Gaulle had just returned from John F. Kennedy’s funeral in Washington. His information minister, Alan Perfeit, asked the question everyone wanted answered. What do you think happened to Kennedy? De Gaul’s response was immediate, cold, certain. What happened to him is what nearly happened to me.

The story is the same as mine. They got him with security forces. They killed him like a dog. Paraphied pressed further. Do you think Oswald was a front? De Gaul didn’t hesitate. Everything leads me to believe it. While America mourned and the Warren Commission prepared to conclude Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, the president of France, one of America’s closest allies, had reached a very different conclusion.

Kennedy was killed by his own security forces. A CIA backed coup, an American military conspiracy. If you want to understand why Charles de Gaulle immediately recognized JFK’s assassination as an inside job and why his analysis recorded but never published in English until 2002 remains one of the most damning assessments of Dallas. Hit that like button.

Because Deg Gaul wasn’t guessing, he knew because the CIA had tried to kill him first. Charles de Gaulle survived 31 assassination attempts between 1944 and 1966. Not metaphorical attacks, actual bullets, actual bombs, actual conspiracies organized by French military officers, intelligence operatives, and paramilitary groups who believed de Gaul was betraying France.

Why? Because de Gaulle wanted to end France’s brutal colonial war in Algeria. He promised Algerian independence. The French military and right-wing extremists were furious. So they formed the OAS organization Arma Secret, a terrorist paramilitary group composed of French intelligence officers, military commanders and colonialists.

They bombed, they assassinated, they planned coups, and they had support from French intelligence, from elements of the French military, and according to substantial evidence, from the CIA. The most serious attempt came on August 22nd, 1962. Pati Clamar, a Paris suburb. De Gaul’s motorcade was ambushed by OAS gunman led by Jean Bastian Tiri, an Air Force Lieutenant Colonel.

Machine gun fire. Over 150 rounds. De Gaulle’s Citroen ADS ra with bullets. Two tires blown out. Windows shattered. Miraculously, neither De Gaul nor his wife were hit. De Gaul survived. But the message was clear. Even the president of France was not safe from rogue security forces. April 21st, 1961. While the world focused on the Bay of Pigs disaster in Cuba, another coup was underway in France.

Four French generals, Maurice Sha, Andre Zeller, Raul Salon, and Edmund Juo seized control of Alier. They plan to march on Paris to overthrow de Gaul to keep Algeria French. Evidence suggests CIA director Alan Dulles encouraged the plot. According to French intelligence sources and later declassified documents, Dulles had been meeting with French right-wing elements for months.

He wanted De Gaul removed. Why? Because de Gaulle opposed American cold war strategy. He wanted an independent French nuclear deterrent. He criticized NATO. He was negotiating with the Soviets. In short, De Gaul wouldn’t obey Washington. So Washington, or at least elements within the CIA, tried to remove him.

When JFK learned of the coup, he was furious. According to multiple accounts, Kennedy told the French ambassador, “I stand in full support of President de Gaul.” But then Kennedy added something chilling. The CIA is such a vast and poorly controlled machine that the most unlikely maneuvers might be true. Translation: I’m not fully in control of my own intelligence agency.

Deg Gaul never forgot that Kennedy had admitted the CIA operated independently, that it defied presidential authority, that it staged coups without White House approval, and in April 1961, it had targeted France’s president. So when Charles de Gaulle heard that John F. Kennedy had been shot in Dallas by a supposed lone communist in a city crawling with security forces, he knew immediately what had happened.

because he’d lived it. In his conversation with Parapit, de Gaulle laid out the playbook. They got their hands on this communist who wasn’t one while still being one. He had a subpar intellect and was an exalted fanatic. Just the man they needed, the perfect one to be accused. Oswald the Patsy. Just like de Gaul’s assassins always had fall guys, extremists, fanatics, people with radical politics who could be blamed.

The guy ran away because he probably became suspicious. They wanted to kill him on the spot before he could be grabbed by the judicial system. Oswald fled the book depository, was arrested in a theater, and everyone expected him to be killed before interrogation. He wasn’t at first. Unfortunately, it didn’t happen exactly the way they had probably planned it would, but a trial, you realize, is just terrible.

People would have talked. They would have dug up so much. So they sent Jack Ruby, the cleanup man, two days later on live television. Problem solved. Then the security forces went looking for someone they totally controlled and who couldn’t refuse their offer. And that guy sacrificed himself to kill the fake assassin supposedly in defense of Kennedy’s memory.

Ruby’s explanation that he killed Oswald to spare Jackie Kennedy the trauma of a trial was absurd to de Gaulle. He’d seen the same pattern in France. Assassins silenced by other assassins. Trails that led nowhere. De Gaul predicted exactly how America would react. As soon as they succeed in wiping out the false assassin, they declare that the justice system no longer need be concerned.

That no further public action was needed now that the guilty perpetrator was dead. Better to assassinate an innocent man than to let a civil war break out. Better an injustice than disorder. And then the cover up. America is in danger of upheavalss. But you’ll see all of them together will observe the law of silence. They will close ranks.

They’ll do everything to stifle any scandal. They will throw Noah’s cloak over these shameful deeds in order to not lose face in front of the whole world. In order to not risk unleashing riots in the United States. in order to preserve the Union and to avoid a new civil war in order to not ask themselves questions.

They don’t want to know. They don’t want to find out. They won’t allow themselves to find out. De Gaul understood the logic perfectly because he’d done the same thing in France after his own assassination attempts. Quickly try conspirators. Execute ring leaders. Close the investigation. Move on. National security. National unity.

National survival. All required silence. November 25th, 1963. Washington, DC. Kennedy’s funeral. Charles de Gaulle attended along with other world leaders. He walked in the procession behind Kennedy’s casket. But de Gaulle was terrified, not of grief, of assassination. According to accounts from his security detail, de Gaulle believed the same forces that killed Kennedy might target foreign leaders at the funeral, eliminate multiple threats at once, blame it on communists, start World War II.

De Gaul’s bodyguards were on high alert. He insisted on minimal motorcade exposure. He wanted to leave Washington immediately after the ceremony. Why such paranoia? Because De Gaul knew if they could kill an American president, they could kill anyone. Was de Gaulle right? Did the CIA kill Kennedy? De Gaulle never provided hard proof, but his analysis was based on pattern recognition.

He’d survived 31 assassination attempts. He knew how security services operated. He knew how coups were staged. He knew how psies were selected and fall guys were silenced. And everything about Dallas fit the template. The psyald’s profile, ex-Marine, Soviet defector, communist sympathizer, was perfect for blame. Too perfect.

The location, Dallas, Texas, Southern Territory, right-wing stronghold, where local police could be controlled. The security failure. The motorcade route was published. The windows in the book depository were left open. Secret Service protocols were violated. The silencing Ruby killing Oswald on live TV preventing a trial, preventing testimony. The investigation.

Warren Commission staffed with establishment figures. Chief Justice Earl Warren, former CIA Director Alan Dulles, whom Kennedy had fired after the Bay of Pigs. The same Dulles who had plotted against De Gaul. The conclusion: Oswald acted alone. No conspiracy. Case closed. Move on.

De Gaul had seen it all before in France against him. French newspapers questioned the official narrative from the start. Leamand published articles doubting lone gunman theory. French intellectuals openly discussed conspiracy. French intelligence sdece conducted its own investigation. Their conclusion Kennedy was killed by American intelligence faction CIA military hardliners.

Right-wing extremists opposing peace initiatives. Why? Because they’d lived it. They’d seen CIA involvement in the 1961 coup. They’d seen how intelligence services operated outside control. They’d seen Alan Dulles up close. Alamperit published a Gaul’s comments in 2002, long after both men were dead. His memoir site de Gaulle became a French bestseller, but it was never translated to English, never published in America, unknown in the US for decades.

When David Talbet quoted them in the devil’s chessboard 2015, Americans finally learned France’s president believed JFK was killed by the CIA. Not Soviets, not Castro, not mafia, the CIA. De Gallal’s assessment carries weight because he survived 31 assassination attempts by security forces. He knew Alan Dulles personally.

He knew CIA had plotted against him. He understood how coups were staged. He recognized the pattern immediately. Was Charles de Gaulle right? We may never know definitively, but consider de Gaulle had no reason to lie in a private conversation with his information minister. His analysis was based on direct experience surviving similar attacks.

He predicted exactly how America would react. And he was right. French intelligence independently reached the same conclusion. The CIA has never released all files on Kennedy’s assassination 60 plus years later. If the official story is true, if Oswald really acted alone, why did America’s closest ally immediately conclude it was a coup? Why did the man who survived more assassination attempts than any modern leader recognize the pattern instantly? And why after 60 years are Americans still not allowed to see all the evidence? If this investigation made you

reconsider the official narrative, hit that like button. Share with anyone who thinks the Warren Commission told the truth. Subscribe for more investigations into what foreign leaders really believed about Dallas. Tell us, do you think de Gaulle was right? Did the CIA kill Kennedy? Because when the president of France, a man who survived 31 murder attempts, tells you he recognizes the playbook, maybe you should listen.

Thank you for watching and remember, sometimes the people who’ve been through it know exactly what they’re looking